How the alt-right weaponized free speech – Maclean’s Magazine

Yes, this is an old article I just found it

Quote from the Article

“By far, the most remarkable image to emerge from the day’s brawl saw Nathan Damigo, a former Marine—and convicted felon, and white supremacist—punching a black-clad, female counter-protestor square in the face.”

Of course! And I say that unironically, Maclean’s magazine either didn’t check or more likely choose to ignore the fact that Moldylocks was actively involved in the riot, and in one video may have even been using improvised hand grenades in the form of m-80’s stuck in glass bottles and throwing them into the crowd.

This fact all by itself moves Louise Rosealma from simply being a spectator to someone who was an actual combatant. That means that you’re no longer subject to any kind of charity or amnesty from your opponents unless you surrender. That and the simple fact that in my case anyone that pulls a weapon on me regardless of gender is going down and going down hard. Then again Maclean’s and more than a few other places also ignored this post by Moldylocks as well.


So here’s the bottom line you regressive fappers! If you think the Alt-Right or anyone else that has been actively opposing you is using free speech as a weapon. Then come on out and challenge them on it. Don’t hide behind no comments allowed articles, or only allow comments for 24 hours because your article can’t hold up to the heat once it’s been outed. Don’t send out Antifa Goons to try and intimidate us. Or do what Clementine Ford did the moment she got called out by Milos Yannapoulos and run away and pretend that you’re somehow above a debate when you’ve actively harassed your critics or anyone else that has disagreed with you.

No! You whiny little snowflakes try fighting out in the open because at this point everything you’re doing is simply delaying the inevitable. And I’m pretty sure my readers know what that is.